Mixed method is characterized by a focus on research problems that require, 1 an examination of real-life contextual understandings, multi-level perspectives, and cultural influences; 2 an intentional application of rigorous quantitative research assessing magnitude and frequency of constructs and rigorous qualitative research exploring the meaning and understanding of the constructs; and, 3 an objective of drawing on the strengths of quantitative and qualitative data gathering techniques to formulate a holistic interpretive framework for generating possible solutions or new understandings of the problem. Unnecessary Explanation of Basic Procedures Remember that you are not writing a how-to guide about a particular method. Taylor[4] mentioned that people writing the literature review try to convey to their readers what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are [4]. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: Record key definitions and their context Look for patterns and frameworks in what is written about a topic such as the context — social, political, historical. The way in which your professor may ask you to frame your analysis can include any of the following approaches:

Development of the Literature Review Four Stages 1. Always review the references cited by the authors in footnotes, endnotes, or a bibliography to help locate additional research on the topic. Importance of a Good Introduction Think of the introduction as a mental road map that must answer for the reader these four questions: Then revise or add connecting phrases or words to make it cohensive and clear. Use the main concept terms you developed in Step 1 to retrieve relevant articles. For example, if you are using a multiple choice questionnaire, readers need to know that it offered your respondents a reasonable range of answers to choose from. It makes no judgments about the work, nor does it provide results or conclusions of the research.

Observational studies are usually flexible and do not necessarily need to be structured around a hypothesis about what you expect to observe [data is emergent rather than pre-existing]. Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination.


taylor dena procter margaret. the literature review a few tips on conducting it

The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research. You should be thinking about it right from the start of the course.

Jackson and Raymond A. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is te your own, be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. Avoid providing data that is not critical to answering the research question. Because descriptive designs often utilize observational methods [as opposed to quantitative methods], the results cannot be replicated.

taylor dena procter margaret. the literature review a few tips on conducting it

Is its significance rew, severity, relevance clearly established? Review and synethesize previously published literature associated with the problem, 3. It addresses any critical questions in the reader’s mind of, “Why the hell didn’t the author examine this?

Statistical methods meta-analysis may or may not be used to analyze and summarize the results of the included studies. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a gew, and what their strengths and weaknesses are.

It can take a long period of time to gather results. In the second phase, the abstracts and introductions were read carefully. Both cknducting are appropriate in how you report finding in the social sciences, but use only one or the other.

taylor dena procter margaret. the literature review a few tips on conducting it

Using a quantitative framework, a sequential study generally utilizes sampling techniques to gather data and applying statistical methods to llterature the data.

Use Ddena Sparingly Some short quotes are okay if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased. Review related literature to help refine how you will approach focusing on the topic and finding a way to analyze it. The classic experimental design specifies an experimental group and a control group.


Pearson, ; Savitt, Ronald. When practitioners use action research, it has the potential to increase the amount they learn consciously from their experience; the action research cycle can be regarded as a learning cycle. Organization and Approach For most research paper formats, there are two possible ways of presenting and organizing the results.

What is the author’s theoretical framework e. More often than not, qualified and valuable data is found at professional places rather than from results given by common search engines.

Literature review – EduTech Wiki

Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: To form the review questions, two sub- steps are needed: Action Research Design Definition and Purpose The essentials of action research design follow a characteristic cycle whereby initially an exploratory stance is adopted, where an understanding of a problem is developed and plans are made for some form of interventionary strategy.

What learning models, if any, have been established to support pervasive learning experiences in these environments? Descriptive Research Design, September 26, If raw data is to be included, place it in frw appendix or set of appendices that are referred to in the text.

What do these studies tell you?

Literature review

However, implicit are other, related problems that kn have been chosen but were rejected. The historical research design is unobtrusive; the act of research does not affect the results of the study.

The purpose of a literature review is to: The empirical-analytical group approaches the study of social sciences in a similar manner that researchers study the natural sciences. European Union, global terrorism, credibility [hint: